Fix tree filtering with new approach
This commit is contained in:
parent
e6e1addbcb
commit
74cf9855a7
|
@ -56,29 +56,41 @@ void TreeSearch::_clean_callable_cache() {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void TreeSearch::_filter_tree(const String &p_search_mask) {
|
||||
if (matching_entries.size() == 0) {
|
||||
if (matching_entries.is_empty()) {
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Vector<bool> item_visibilities;
|
||||
item_visibilities.resize(ordered_tree_items.size());
|
||||
|
||||
// Make all entries visible that have any matching descendents. O(n)
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i < ordered_tree_items.size(); i++) {
|
||||
TreeItem *cur_item = ordered_tree_items[i];
|
||||
|
||||
if (number_matches.has(cur_item)) {
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
TreeItem *entry = ordered_tree_items[i];
|
||||
if (number_matches.has(entry) && number_matches[entry] > 0) {
|
||||
item_visibilities.set(i, true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TreeItem *first_counting_ancestor = cur_item;
|
||||
bool parents_visible = true;
|
||||
while (first_counting_ancestor && !number_matches.has(first_counting_ancestor)) {
|
||||
// Performance: we only need to check the first visible ancestor. This is already optimal because of the ordering in ordered_tree_items.
|
||||
if (!first_counting_ancestor->is_visible()){
|
||||
parents_visible = false;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
// Make all descendents of matching entries visible. O(n) * log(|matching_entries|)
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i < ordered_tree_items.size(); i++) {
|
||||
TreeItem *entry = ordered_tree_items[i];
|
||||
TreeItem *next_entry = entry->get_next();
|
||||
if (!next_entry && i < ordered_tree_items.size() - 1) {
|
||||
next_entry = ordered_tree_items[i + 1];
|
||||
}
|
||||
first_counting_ancestor = first_counting_ancestor->get_parent();
|
||||
if (_vector_has_bsearch(matching_entries, entry)) {
|
||||
int j = i;
|
||||
for (; j < ordered_tree_items.size() && ordered_tree_items[j] != next_entry; j++) {
|
||||
item_visibilities.set(j, true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!parents_visible || !first_counting_ancestor || !_vector_has_bsearch(matching_entries, first_counting_ancestor)) {
|
||||
cur_item->set_visible(false);
|
||||
i = j - 1; // every entry is only processed once.
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// apply visibility. O(n)
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i < ordered_tree_items.size(); i++) {
|
||||
if (!item_visibilities[i]) {
|
||||
ordered_tree_items[i]->set_visible(false);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue